Mass Incarceration Has Become the New Welfare
America’s criminal-justice system has, in its failures, given way to policy that works against a disproportionate number of African Americans.

What created this system? Coates suggests that 50 years ago policymakers and pundits refused to heed—or willfully misread—Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s dire warnings about the dissolution of the “Negro family” and his rather inchoate “case for national action.” Rather than redressing the problem of racism and “Negro” poverty, instead they turned to the expansion of a criminal justice system in the name of “law and order.” Although Coates is justifiably hard on Moynihan—for his sexism and faith in patriarchy, for his subsequent reactionary politics, and most of all for lacking the courage of his convictions—like the historian Daniel Geary, he sees the Moynihan of 1965 as a closet supporter of affirmative action.
But, in characteristic fashion, he goes beyond this, asking readers to think in new ways about disturbing phenomena that they may take for granted. Bringing together Moynihan’s concerns about black family structure with the cold fact of mass incarceration produces a striking conclusion: Mass incarceration actually causes crime. In its long-term impact on the black family, mass incarceration has many of the disintegrative effects that Moynihan attributed to slavery. It certainly has a similar multigenerational impact; the children of imprisoned people have a much higher chance of themselves being incarcerated as adults.
There is no way to dispute this: In the post-civil-rights era, racial policy drives mass incarceration. Indeed, mass incarceration is racial policy. As Coates shows, the association of blacks and criminality in the white mind is so deeply rooted in American history as to be virtually unassailable. Moynihan himself observed that in 1960, 37 percent of the prison population was black.
Some historians point more specifically to the drug laws, most notoriously those advocated by Governor Nelson Rockefeller in New York in the early 1970s, which became a national model for punishing narcotics offenders, with predictable effects on prison populations. Here, as Coates shows, a racialized criminal justice system had extraordinarily skewed effects.
Others, most notably the historians Naomi Murakawa and Heather Thompson, see liberal Democrats as the culprits, emphasizing Lyndon Johnson’s Safe Streets Act of 1968 and the resulting vast expansion of federal intervention in crime control (re-upped by President Clinton in the 1990s). The political scientist Michael Fortner argues in his controversial new book, The Black Silent Majority, that it was working- and middle-class African Americans, not just conservative whites, who clamored in the 1970s for a more robust penal system to clean up their decaying neighborhoods.
Coates acknowledges most of these views, but ultimately seems to favor the “southern strategy” explanation. It is true, as he notes, that by the 1990s the resort to mass incarceration as social policy had become a bipartisan affair. Nevertheless, a certain kind of reactionary politics got the ball rolling—that is, a reaction to the emancipation of Black people after 1965, the relatively lower incarceration rates for blacks living in the Jim Crow South up until the 1960s—a region effectively, in Coates’s words, a “police state” as far as African Americans were concerned—testifies to this. As civil rights spread in the South and black self-assertion spread in the North, politicians in both regions and of both parties turned to incarceration to assuage white anxieties and preserve racial control.
The search for historical explanations, and the heartening recent bipartisan recognition that as social policy mass incarceration is unsustainable, provide reasons to be hopeful. Yet, if the past is any guide—and as a historian, I have to believe it is—penal reform in the United States rarely attacks the root of the problem, which is racial and economic injustice. A century ago, in the face of national outcry, the brutal practice in the southern states of leasing prisoners to the highest bidder to work in coal mines, turpentine farms, and phosphate mines came to an end. It was, however, replaced by the chain gang on southern roads. Touted as a great and humane reform, the public road gang itself soon became a notorious symbol of racial cruelty and injustice. Today, we are back to seeing prison privatization as a potential solution to the incarceration crisis.
Coates is right: To reform criminal justice requires “reforming the institutional structure, the communities, and the politics that surround it.” Mustering the requisite political and social resolve to make those changes may seem impossible. But consider this: How would the nation react if one out of every four white men between the ages of 20 and 35 spent time in prison?
Please read my blog: http://justiceformyson2@aol.com. Please follow me on twitter. https://twitter.com/justiceforhim2, Vine and Instagram. email: justiceformyson2@aol.com
Please write me at:
Justice For My Son 2
PO Box 70111
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35407
I believe that you are entirely accurate in your description of wrongful convictions being the new welfare. This country incarcerates more people per capital that all of the top 10 free world countries combined. We are still building jails and privatizing them to house more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s such a well written article.
I also believe mass incarceration is increasing. I’m told we may be required to say Civil Commitment Center instead of PRISON. And INMATES… They’ll be refered to as RESIDENTS. I still haven’t fully confirmed this. In that it may be a PRISON reserved for certain crimes such as sexual assaults.
My sons is a Wrongfull conviction. He’s deteriorating. I haven’t heard from him. It’s not like him. 💔
LikeLiked by 1 person
Keep up the good work and never think about giving up. We have to stay focused when we fight the system when the wrongdoers are the people who make a living of incarcerating the innocent. Even when they are confronted with the truth, their Egos are so big, that they would knowingly let someone who they know is innocent remain in prison… just because they do not want to accept the responsibility that comes with being wrong….. They get up every morning and go to sleep at night an have no conscious or guilt of their act. Sometimes they will be the first to tell you they believe in God and have morals, but they do not have souls.. Stay strong, keep fighting, stay in touch… CJ
LikeLike
thank~you 👍
LikeLike
Great article. I had posted it on my blog as well when it came out.
LikeLike
Thank you. I have been working an exhausting amount of hours and hadn’t blogged. I am very grateful to you for your suggestions. It’s slow today at work and I research everything you mentioned. Thank you again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is my pleasure!
LikeLiked by 1 person